Generated by Rank Math SEO, this is an llms.txt file designed to help LLMs better understand and index this website.

# The Rosen Law Firm: Investor Counsel

## Sitemaps
[XML Sitemap](https://rosenlegal.com/sitemap_index.xml): Includes all crawlable and indexable pages.

## Posts
- [Galena Biopharma: A Twist on The Classic “Pump & Dump”](https://rosenlegal.com/galena-biopharma-a-twist-on-the-classic-pump-dump/): Galena is a biopharmaceutical company that develops targeted cancer-fighting drugs. This case began as a fairly typical ‘pump & dump’ situation whereby promoters used blogs and digital media to sing the praises of a low priced, thinly traded stock, in order to inflate the price before selling their shares into the inflated price and then ceasing the promotion. They reap the profit, after which the share price collapses, leaving investors who’d bought during the promotion holding the bag. The case soon became more complicated however, and turned on the finer points of applicable law.
- [Fiat Chrysler Cheats Emissions Tests & Investors](https://rosenlegal.com/fiat-chrysler-cheats-emissions-tests-investors/): The Rosen Law Firm recovered millions for investors who purchased the company stock of automotive giant Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV (FCA), and who were damaged when the market became aware that FCA had cheated on diesel emissions tests and failed to comply with safety regulations. This case is a typical example of a corporation issuing false and misleading statements to the public that conceal pertinent negative information. The concealment of this negative information artificially inflates a company’s stock price. However, the negative information inevitably leaks into the market, which causes the company’s stock price to decline, harming shareholders.
- [The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. Announces Proposed Class Action Settlement on Behalf of Purchasers of Correvio Pharma Corp. common stock – CORV](https://rosenlegal.com/the-rosen-law-firm-p-a-announces-proposed-class-action-settlement-on-behalf-of-purchasers-of-correvio-pharma-corp-common-stock-corv/): If you purchased Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. (“Blue Apron”) Class A Common Stock during the period from June 29, 2017, through August 25, 2017, both dates inclusive (“Settlement Class Period”), your rights may be affected by this Settlement, including the release and extinguishment of claims you may possess relating to your ownership interest in Blue Apron Class A Common Stock. If you have not received a detailed Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action (“Notice”) and a copy of the Proof of Claim and Release Form
- [The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. Announces Proposed Class Action Settlement on Behalf of Purchasers of Correvio Pharma Corp. common stock – CORV](https://rosenlegal.com/corv-class-action-settlement/): If you purchased Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. (“Blue Apron”) Class A Common Stock during the period from June 29, 2017, through August 25, 2017, both dates inclusive (“Settlement Class Period”), your rights may be affected by this Settlement, including the release and extinguishment of claims you may possess relating to your ownership interest in Blue Apron Class A Common Stock. If you have not received a detailed Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action (“Notice”) and a copy of the Proof of Claim and Release Form
- [The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. Announces Proposed Class Action Settlement on Behalf of Purchasers of Correvio Pharma Corp. common stock – CORV](https://rosenlegal.com/the-rosen-law-firm-p-a-announces-proposed-class-action-settlement-on-behalf-of-purchasers-of-correvio-pharma-corp-common-stock-corv-3/): If you purchased Blue Apron Holdings, Inc. (“Blue Apron”) Class A Common Stock during the period from June 29, 2017, through August 25, 2017, both dates inclusive (“Settlement Class Period”), your rights may be affected by this Settlement, including the release and extinguishment of claims you may possess relating to your ownership interest in Blue Apron Class A Common Stock. If you have not received a detailed Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action (“Notice”) and a copy of the Proof of Claim and Release Form

## Pages
- [Home](https://rosenlegal.com/): New Securities Class Action Lawsuits
- [Blog](https://rosenlegal.com/blog/): Our Blog
- [Accessibility Statement](https://rosenlegal.com/accessibility-statement/): Our mission at Rosen Law Firm is to make a more accessible web space for our team, our clients, and our visitors.
- [Thank You Filed](https://rosenlegal.com/thank-you-filed/): Thank you for participating in the securities class action. In the coming days, other law firms may announce the same or similar case. There is no need to sign up for every case or law firm investigation. Signing up with multiple law firms will not increase your chances of obtaining a recovery. Doing so will likely cause confusion about your claim.
- [Thank You Investigative](https://rosenlegal.com/thank-you-investigative/): Thank you for submitting your information concerning the matter.
- [Form Confirmation](https://rosenlegal.com/form-confirmation/)
- [About](https://rosenlegal.com/about/): The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. is dedicated to recovering damages for shareholders victimized by securities fraud and directors’ and officers’ breaches of fiduciary duty. Our attorneys have a wealth of knowledge and experience handling complex financial litigation and winning significant victories and settlements for our clients. By focusing exclusively on securities class actions and shareholder litigation, we have risen to the forefront of plaintiffs’ firms and have recovered damages totaling hundreds of millions of dollars for our clients.
- [Privacy Policy](https://rosenlegal.com/privacy-policy-2/): The Rosen Law Firm is committed to protecting your privacy. This includes observing relevant legal and regulatory requirements and employing appropriate security measures in order to protect your personal information.
- [Submit form](https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/)
- [This is a test page](https://rosenlegal.com/this-is-a-test-page/): Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
- [Institutional Investors](https://rosenlegal.com/institutional-investors/): The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. provides individualized portfolio monitoring services to public and union pension funds, Taft Hartley, mutual funds, hedge funds, endowments and family offices, both domestically and overseas. Our personalized approach to portfolio monitoring identifies potential recoverable losses for our institutional clients’ portfolios due to corporate fraud and misconduct. The institutional portfolio monitoring effort is headed by a veteran of 35 years on Wall Street specializing in equity and derivative securities, and utilizes ISS Securities Class Action Services to analyze investor trades in affected securities and calculate losses.

## News
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Klarna Group PLC Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-klarna-group-plc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in DEFI Technologies Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-defi-technologies-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Freeport-McMoran Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-freeport-mcmoran-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel in Telix Pharmaceuticals Limited Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-telix-pharmaceuticals-limited-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel in Gauzy Ltd Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-gauzy-ltd-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in KBR, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-kbr-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [The Rosen Law Firm P.A. Announces Proposed Settlement on Behalf of Purchasers of DiDi Global Inc. American Depositary Shares](https://rosenlegal.com/news/the-rosen-law-firm-p-a-announces-proposed-settlement-on-behalf-of-purchasers-of-didi-global-inc-american-depositary-shares/): NEW YORK, Feb. 9, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- The Rosen Law Firm P.A. announces that the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has approved the following announcement of a proposed settlement that would benefit purchasers of DiDi Global Inc. American Depositary Shares (OTCMKTS: DIDIY) (formerlyNYSE: DIDI):
- [The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. Announces Proposed Class Action Settlement on Behalf of Purchasers of Securities of Arrival SA and/or CIIG Merger Corp. – ARVLF](https://rosenlegal.com/news/the-rosen-law-firm-p-a-announces-proposed-class-action-settlement-on-behalf-of-purchasers-of-securities-of-arrival-sa-and-or-ciig-merger-corp-arvlf/): BROOKLYN, N.Y., Dec. 08, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. announces that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York has approved the following announcement of a proposed class action settlement that would benefit purchasers of securities of Arrival SA and/or CIIG Merger Corp. (OTCMKTS: ARVLF):
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-iovance-biotherapeutics-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Quantum Corporation  Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-quantum-corporation-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-petco-health-and-wellness-company-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel in CTO Realty Growth, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-cto-realty-growth-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Replimune Group Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-replimune-group-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Hesai Technology Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-hesai-technology-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel in Flywire Corp. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-flywire-corp-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Sable Offshore Corp. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-sable-offshore-corp-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Reddit, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-reddit-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Largely Defeats Motion To Dismiss In Sharecare Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-largely-defeats-motion-to-dismiss-in-sharecare-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in The Bancorp, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-the-bancorp-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Plaintiffs Reach Further Settlement in Just Energy Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/plaintiffs-reach-further-settlement-in-just-energy-securities-class-action/): TORONTO, Aug. 23, 2025 /CNW/ - The Court-appointed representatives of a class of former shareholders of Just Energy Group Inc. ("Just Energy") have reached a settlement of the class action commenced following Just Energy's August 2019 restatement of its financial statements.
- [Rosen Law Firm Largely Defeats Motion To Dismiss In BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-largely-defeats-motion-to-dismiss-in-brainstorm-cell-therapeutics-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel in Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-rocket-pharmaceuticals-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Eleven Rosen Attorneys Recognized by Peer Reviewed 2026 Editions of Best Lawyers and Best Lawyers Ones to Watch](https://rosenlegal.com/news/eleven-rosen-attorneys-recognized-by-peer-reviewed-2026-editions-of-best-lawyers-and-best-lawyers-ones-to-watch/): Congratulations.
- [The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. Announces Proposed Class Action Settlement on Behalf of Purchasers of Compass Minerals International Inc. Securities – CMP](https://rosenlegal.com/news/the-rosen-law-firm-p-a-announces-proposed-class-action-settlement-on-behalf-of-purchasers-of-compass-minerals-international-inc-securities-cmp/): KANSAS CITY, Kan., Aug. 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. announces that the United States District Court for the District of Kansas has approved the following announcement of a proposed class action settlement that would benefit purchasers of Compass Minerals International Inc. securities (NYSE: CMP):
- [Rosen Law Firm Materially Defeats Motion To Dismiss In Microvast Holdings Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-materially-defeats-motion-to-dismiss-in-microvast-holdings-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Revives Maiden Holdings Ltd. Securities Class Action with Victory in United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-revives-maiden-holdings-ltd-securities-litigation-with-victory-in-united-states-court-of-appeals-for-the-third-circuit/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel in Avis Budget Group, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-avis-budget-group-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Sun Communities, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-sun-communities-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-ultra-clean-holdings-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Ten Rosen Attorneys named to 2025 Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers.  Congrats to Larry Rosen, Phillip Kim, Brian Alexander, Jing Chen 陈晶, Sara Fuks, Jacob Goldberg, Jonathan Horne, Yu Shi, Jonathan Stern and Daniel Tyre-Karp.](https://rosenlegal.com/news/ten-rosen-attorneys-named-to-2025-lawdragon-500-leading-plaintiff-financial-lawyers-congrats-to-larry-rosen-phillip-kim-brian-alexander-jing-chen-%e9%99%88%e6%99%b6-sara-fuks-jacob-goldberg-jo/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-grocery-outlet-holding-corp-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel in Sana Biotechnology, Inc.  Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-sana-biotechnology-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Late Stage Asset Management LLC Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-late-stage-asset-management-llc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Pacira BioSciences, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-pacira-biosciences-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel in Elastic N.V. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-elastic-n-v-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel in Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-polestar-automotive-holding-uk-plc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel in Alarum Technologies Ltd. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-alarum-technologies-ltd-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel in Newmont Corporation Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-newmont-corporation-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Visa, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-visa-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel in Micron Technology, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-micron-technology-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Nextracker Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-nextracker-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Aehr Test Systems Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-aehr-test-systems-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in WM Technology, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-wm-technology-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel in Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-warner-bros-discovery-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Cummins Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-cummins-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in FAT Brands Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-fat-brands-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Flux Power Holdings, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-flux-power-holdings-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in TMC The Metals Company, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-tmc-the-metals-company-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Li Auto, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-li-auto-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. Announces Proposed Class Action Settlement on Behalf of Purchasers of Dada Nexus Limited American Depositary Shares – DADA](https://rosenlegal.com/news/the-rosen-law-firm-p-a-announces-proposed-class-action-settlement-on-behalf-of-purchasers-of-dada-nexus-limited-american-depositary-shares-dada/): LOS ANGELES, Dec. 30, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. announces that the United States District Court for the Central District of California has approved the following announcement of a proposed class action settlement that would benefit purchasers of Dada Nexus Limited American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: DADA):
- [The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. Announces Proposed Class Action Settlement on Behalf of Purchasers of GDS Holdings Limited Publicly-Traded American Depositary Shares – GDS](https://rosenlegal.com/news/the-rosen-law-firm-p-a-announces-proposed-class-action-settlement-on-behalf-of-purchasers-of-gds-holdings-limited-publicly-traded-american-depositary-shares-gds/): LOS ANGELES, Nov. 04, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. announces that the United States District Court for the Central District of California has approved the following announcement of a proposed class action settlement that would benefit purchasers of GDS Holdings Limited publicly-traded American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: GDS):
- [The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. Announces Proposed Class Action Settlement on Behalf of Investors in Vanguard Investor Target Retirement Funds](https://rosenlegal.com/news/the-rosen-law-firm-p-a-announces-proposed-class-action-settlement-on-behalf-of-investors-in-vanguard-investor-target-retirement-funds/): PHILADELPHIA, Dec. 24, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. announces that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has approved the following announcement of a proposed class action settlement that would benefit investors in Vanguard Investor Target Retirement Funds:
- [MULLEN AUTOMOTIVE, INC. DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT: Notice of Proposed Settlement and Settlement Hearing](https://rosenlegal.com/news/mullen-automotive-inc-derivative-settlement-notice-of-proposed-settlement-and-settlement-hearing/): The Settlement Hearing is scheduled for January 24, 2025 at 10:00 a.m. before the Honorable Dolly M. Gee, United States District Court for the Central District of California, 350 West 1st Street, Courtroom 8C, 8th Floor, Los Angeles, CA, 90012
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Ardelyx, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-ardelyx-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel in Altimmune, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-altimmune-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel in Intel Corporation Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-intel-corporation-securities-class-action/)
- [Brian Alexander, Josh Baker, Michael Cohen, Gonen Haklay, Brent LaPointe, Erica Stone, and Daniel Tyre-Karp named by Best Lawyers Ones to Watch in America 2025.  Phillip Kim named in the 2025 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America.](https://rosenlegal.com/news/28053/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in EHang Holdings Limited Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-ehang-holdings-limited-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Exscientia PLC Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-exscientia-plc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in AXT, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-axt-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Materially Defeats Motion To Dismiss In ENOVIX Corporation Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-materially-defeats-motion-to-dismiss-in-enovix-corporation-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in The Chemours Company Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-the-chemours-company-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Northern Genesis Acquisition Corp n/k/a The Lion Electric Company Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-northern-genesis-acquisition-corp-n-k-a-the-lion-electric-company-securities-class-action/)
- [Larry Rosen, Phillip Kim, Jacob Goldberg, Jonathan Stern, Yu Shi and Jing Chen selected for 2024 Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers](https://rosenlegal.com/news/larry-rosen-phillip-kim-jacob-goldberg-jonathan-stern-yu-shi-and-jing-chen-selected-for-2024-lawdragon-500-leading-plaintiff-financial-lawyers/)
- [Laurence Rosen, Phillip Kim, Sara Fuks, Yu Shi, and Erica Stone chosen as Super Lawyers 2024.](https://rosenlegal.com/news/laurence-rosen-phillip-kim-sara-fuks-yu-shi-and-erica-stone-chosen-as-super-lawyers-2024/)
- [The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. Ranked by Legal 500 as a top law firm in Securities Litigation: Plaintiff for 2024.](https://rosenlegal.com/news/the-rosen-law-firm-p-a-ranked-by-legal-500-as-a-top-law-firm-in-securities-litigation-plaintiff-for-2024/)
- [The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. Announces Proposed Class Action Settlement on Behalf of Purchasers of NBA Top Shot Moments](https://rosenlegal.com/news/the-rosen-law-firm-p-a-announces-proposed-class-action-settlement-on-behalf-of-purchasers-of-nba-top-shot-moments/): NEW YORK, July 03, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. announces that the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has approved the following announcement of a proposed class action settlement that would benefit purchasers of NBA Top Shot Moments:
- [The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. Announces Proposed Class Action Settlement on Behalf of Purchasers of Publicly-Traded Astec Industries, Inc. Common Stock – ASTE](https://rosenlegal.com/news/the-rosen-law-firm-p-a-announces-proposed-class-action-settlement-on-behalf-of-purchasers-of-publicly-traded-astec-industries-inc-common-stock-aste/): CHATTANOOGA, Tenn., June 24, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --  The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. announces that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee has approved the following announcement of a proposed class action settlement that would benefit purchasers of publicly-traded Astec Industries, Inc. common stock (NASDAQ: ASTE):
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel In Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-blue-ridge-bankshares-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. Announces Proposed Class Action Settlement on Behalf of Purchasers of Electric Last Mile Solutions, Inc. Publicly-Traded Common Stock – ELMSQ](https://rosenlegal.com/news/the-rosen-law-firm-p-a-announces-proposed-class-action-settlement-on-behalf-of-purchasers-of-electric-last-mile-solutions-inc-publicly-traded-common-stock-elmsq/): NEWARK, N.J., May 07, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. announces that the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey has approved the following announcement of a proposed class action settlement that would benefit purchasers of Electric Last Mile Solutions, Inc. publicly-traded common stock (OTCMKTS: ELMSQ):
- [ISS ranks The Rosen Law Firm 3rd in number of securities class action settlements in 2023.  The firm has been ranked in the Top 4 each year since 2013.](https://rosenlegal.com/news/iss-ranks-the-rosen-law-firm-3rd-in-number-of-securities-class-action-settlements-in-2023-the-firm-has-been-ranked-in-the-top-4-each-year-since-2013/)
- [The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. Announces Proposed Settlement in the FTA Securities Litigation](https://rosenlegal.com/news/the-rosen-law-firm-p-a-announces-proposed-settlement-in-the-fta-securities-litigation/): SAN DIEGO, May 1, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- The following statement is being issued by Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP and The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. regarding the FTA Securities Settlement:
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel In Dada Nexus Limited Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-dada-nexus-limited-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in James River Group Holdings, Ltd. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-james-river-group-holdings-ltd-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Defeats Motion To Dismiss In DiDi Global Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-defeats-to-dismiss-in-didi-global-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel In The Lovesac Company Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-the-lovesac-company-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel In Microvast Holdings, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-microvast-holdings-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Defeats Motion To Dismiss In Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-defeats-to-dismiss-in-live-nation-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel In Nuscale Power Corporation Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-nuscale-power-corporation-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel In Capstone Green Energy Corp. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-capstone-green-energy-corp-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel In Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-brainstorm-cell-therapeutics-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel In Gigacloud Technology, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-gigacloud-technology-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel In Wheels Up Experience, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-wheels-up-experience-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Defeats in Part Motion to Dismiss in Core Scientific, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-defeats-in-part-motion-to-dismiss-in-core-scientific-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel In CS Disco, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-cs-disco-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. Announces Proposed Class Action Settlement on Behalf of Purchasers of Covia Holdings Corporation f/k/a Fairmount Santrol Holdings, Inc. Securities](https://rosenlegal.com/news/the-rosen-law-firm-p-a-announces-proposed-class-action-settlement-on-behalf-of-purchasers-of-covia-holdings-corporation-f-k-a-fairmount-santrol-holdings-inc-securities/): CLEVELAND, Dec. 18, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. announces that the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio-Eastern Division has approved the following announcement of a proposed class action settlement that would benefit purchasers of Covia Holdings Corporation f/k/a Fairmount Santrol Holdings, Inc. securities (NYSE: CVIA, OTC: CVIAQ, and NYSE: FMSA):
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel In PacWest Bancorp Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-pacwest-bancorp-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Defeats Motions to Dismiss in Vanguard Target Date Funds Capital Gains Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-defeats-motions-to-dismiss-in-vanguard-target-date-funds-capital-gains-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel In GDS Holdings Ltd. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-gds-holdings-ltd-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Co-Lead Counsel in Live Nation Entertainment Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-co-lead-counsel-in-live-nation-entertainment-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Secures Reversal of Dismissal in Biogen Inc. Securities Class Action in the First Circuit Court of Appeals](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-secures-reversal-of-dismissal-in-biogen-inc-securities-class-action-in-the-first-circuit-court-of-appeals/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Largely Defeats Motion to Dismiss filed in Tenet Fintech Group Inc. f/k/a/ Peak Fintech Group, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-largely-defeats-motion-to-dismiss-filed-in-tenet-fintech-group-inc-f-k-a-peak-fintech-group-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. Announces Proposed Class Action Settlement on Behalf of Purchasers of Tarena International, Inc. American Depositary Shares – TEDU](https://rosenlegal.com/news/the-rosen-law-firm-p-a-announces-proposed-class-action-settlement-on-behalf-of-purchasers-of-tarena-international-inc-american-depositary-shares-tedu/): BROOKLYN, N.Y., Oct. 02, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. announces that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York has approved the following announcement of a proposed class action settlement that would benefit purchasers of Tarena International, Inc. American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: TEDU):
- [Rosen Law Firm Largely Defeats Motion to Dismiss in Missfresh Limited Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-largely-defeats-motion-to-dismiss-in-missfresh-limited-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Polished.com Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-polished-com-inc-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Co-Lead Counsel in Douyu International Holdings Limited Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-co-lead-counsel-in-douyu-international-holdings-limited-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Law Firm Appointed Lead Counsel in Tal Education Group Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-appointed-lead-counsel-in-tal-education-group-securities-class-action/)
- [Rosen Attorneys Phillip Kim and Michael Cohen recognized by Best Lawyers® in The Best Lawyers of America® and Best Lawyers: One to Watch in America® 2024, Respectively.](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-attorneys-phillip-kim-and-michael-cohen-recognized-by-best-lawyers-in-the-best-lawyers-of-america-and-best-lawyers-one-to-watch-in-america-2024-respectively/)
- [In re Fluor Corp. Stockholder Derivative Litigation, Case No. 3:20-cv-01442-X (N.D. Tex.) – Notice of Proposed Settlement and Settlement Hearing](https://rosenlegal.com/news/in-re-fluor-corp-stockholder-derivative-litigation-case-no-320-cv-01442-x-n-d-tex-notice-of-proposed-settlement-and-settlement-hearing/): Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement
- [Rosen Law Firm Largely Defeats Motion to Dismiss in Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc. Securities Class Action](https://rosenlegal.com/news/rosen-law-firm-largely-defeats-motion-to-dismiss-in-stronghold-digital-mining-inc-securities-class-action/)

## Cases
- [Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited](https://rosenlegal.com/case/regencell-bioscience-holdings-limited/): According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
- [Globant S.A.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/globant-s-a/): In mid-2023, Globant announced a $1 billion strategic pivot to increase its Latin American business. According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, Globant touted to investors the success of its Latin American pivot and the strength of its Latin American operations, as well as heralded itself as a market leader and employer of choice in the region. Unbeknownst to investors, Globant’s Latin American strategy was not successful. In reality, Globant was facing pervasive problems with its Latin American operations, including declining demand for its services, client defections, and project cancellations. Globant also froze wages for its employees in Mexico and Argentina, further harming its Latin American operations and leading to widespread employee turmoil and degraded client services.
- [POET Technologies Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/poet-technologies-inc/): On April 27, 2026, Investing.com published an article entitled "POET Technologies stock tumbles after losing Marvell orders." The article stated that POET Technologies stock fell "after the company disclosed the cancellation of all purchase orders from Celestial AI, now owned by Marvell Semiconductor Inc. Marvell provided written notice on April 23, 2026, canceling all purchase orders, including those for initial production units first announced by POET in a press release on April 25, 2023. Marvell cited the company’s disclosures of information related to the purchase orders and shipping details as violations of confidentiality obligations."
- [SES AI Corporation](https://rosenlegal.com/case/ses-ai-corporation/): According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
- [LKQ Corporation](https://rosenlegal.com/case/lkq-corporation/): According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, LKQ repeatedly touted the benefits of the acquisition of FinishMaster, a subsidiary of Uni-Select. For example, in announcing the acquisition in February 2023, LKQ represented that the acquisition was a “compelling strategic fit” to “enhance LKQ’s business and drive profitable growth.” LKQ also represented that the acquisition presented “minimal integration risk,” including because “Uni-Select’s FinishMaster business improves LKQ’s scale and product mix to compete” in the North American automotive paint segment.
- [Gossamer Bio, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/gossamer-bio-inc/): According to the lawsuit, defendants provided overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while, at the same time, disseminating false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the study design for Gossamer’s Phase 3 PROSERA study, particularly, controlling for the placebo response at the Latin American testing sites.
- [Phreesia, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/phreesia-inc/): On March 30, 2026, Phreesia issued a press release entitled "Phreesia Announces Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2026 Results." In this press release, Phreesia announced that it was "lowering our revenue outlook for fiscal 2027."
- [DNOW Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/dnow-inc/): On February 20, 2026, StockStory published an article entitled "Why DNOW (DNOW) Shares Are Getting Obliterated Today." The article stated that DNOW shares fell "after the company reported disappointing fourth-quarter 2025 financial results, which included a significant loss and missed Wall Street's expectations."
- [Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/babcock-wilcox-enterprises-inc/): According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
- [ADMA Biologics, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/adma-biologics-inc/): On March 24, 2026, Investing.com published an article entitled "ADMA Biologics shares plunge on short seller allegations." The article stated that ADMA Biologics shares fell "after short seller Culper Research released a report alleging the company engaged in channel stuffing to inflate revenue growth."
- [Manhattan Associates, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/manhattan-associates-inc/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duties by the directors and officers of Manhattan Associates, Inc. (NASDAQ: MANH).
- [Zillow Group, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/zillow-group-inc/): On September 30, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission published an announcement entitled "FTC Sues Zillow and Redfin Over Illegal Agreement to Suppress Rental Advertising Competition". The announcement stated that the FTC had sued "Zillow and Redfin over an unlawful agreement that eliminates Redfin as a competitor in the market for placing advertising of rental housing on internet listing services (ILSs)—the websites that millions of Americans use to find their next rental home."
- [Upstart Holdings, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/upstart-holdings-inc-2/): According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
- [Medpace Holdings, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/medpace-holdings-inc/): According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or concealed material adverse facts concerning the true state of Medpace's backlog cancellation rate. In fact, defendants continuously touted "well behaved" cancellation rates. Furthermore, Medpace made clear that cancellations were not caused by weak business or a weak funding environment, providing investors with overly positive growth expectations that could not maintain the projected 1.15 book-to-bill ratio.
- [Stellantis N.V.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/stellantis-n-v/): According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or concealed material adverse facts concerning the true state of Stellantis’ earnings growth potential, notably, that Stellantis was not truly equipped or positioned to grow its adjusted operating income (“AOI”) as forecasted; that electrification was either not truly growing as defendants claimed or that Stellantis was not well positioned to capitalize upon it and convert the opportunity to growth. Instead, Stellantis would ultimately be required to take on considerable charges to adjust its priority, focus, and overall execution in a shift away from battery-powered electric vehicles (“BEV”).
- [Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/dicks-sporting-goods-inc/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duties by the directors and officers of Dick's Sporting Goods Inc. (NYSE: DKS).
- [zSpace Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/zspace-inc/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [New Era Energy & Digital, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/new-era-energy-digital-inc/): According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
- [Pinterest, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/pinterest-inc/): According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
- [Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/aldeyra-therapeutics-inc-2/): According to the complaint, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
- [Vital Farms, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/vital-farms-inc/): According to the complaint, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
- [Super Micro Computer, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/super-micro-computer-inc-2/): According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
- [Atara Biotherapeutics, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/atara-biotherapeutics-inc/): According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
- [Coty Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/coty-inc/): According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or concealed material adverse facts concerning the true state of Coty’s slowing growth in the beauty market, notably, the Consumer Beauty market was underperforming, margins were compressed by increased marketing investments and there was slowing growth in its Prestige fragrance segment.
- [Power Solutions International, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/power-solutions-international-inc/): According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
- [Hercules Capital, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/hercules-capital-inc/): According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
- [ImmunityBio, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/immunitybio-inc/): According to the complaint, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
- [Concorde International Group Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/concorde-international-group-ltd/): According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
- [Flow Foundation](https://rosenlegal.com/case/flow/): If you purchased FLOW (FLOW-USD) cryptocurrency on or before December 27, 2025 and held your FLOW cryptocurrency through December 29, 2025, please reach out to the firm. There are no out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
- [Disc Medicine, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/disc-medicine-inc/): On February 13, 2026, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") issued a Complete Response Letter ("CRL") to Disc Medicine regarding its bitopertin program. The FDA stated they could not approve Disc Medicine's new drug application ("NDA") as there were uncertainties in the NDA that would need additional evidence.
- [Lufax Holding Ltd](https://rosenlegal.com/case/lufax-holding-ltd/): According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
- [TruBridge, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/trubridge-inc/): On March 17, 2026, TruBridge filed a Notification of Late Filing on Form 12b-25, in which it stated that TruBridge was unable to file its Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. The report stated its inability to file was a result of “the identification of out-of-period errors of previously issued financial statements and the consequential need to complete certain related analyses.” In addition, the report stated that “the Company’s management identified errors in the Company’s previously issued consolidated financial statements, including for the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, as well as out-of-period errors in the condensed financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2025. These errors relate to revenue recognition and related contract cost, stock-based compensation expense, and capitalized software development expense. As a result, the Company is required to make revisions to its previously issued consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, filed with its Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the years then ended, in order to recognize certain of such revenues, costs and expenses in the appropriate fiscal year.”
- [Gartner, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/gartner-inc/): According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose facts concerning the true state of Gartner’s growth rates; notably, that it was not truly equipped to handle ongoing challenges in its industry to either meet consulting revenue targets or to increase or even maintain its contract value ("CV") growth rate; Gartner’s repeated claims of being able to achieve 12-16% CV growth rates in a “normal” macroeconomic environment proved to be unrealistic.
- [Xponential Fitness, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/xponential-fitness-inc/): On February 26, 2026, Xponential filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Current Report on Form 8-K announcing a stipulated consent agreement between the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") and Xponential regarding the FTC's previous investigation into Xponential. The report stated that, "the Company has agreed to pay $17.0 million over a 12-month period. The Company has also recently finalized a $22.75 million settlement (to be paid out over a thirty-five month period) with over 500 current and former franchisees."
- [Green Circle Decarbonize Technology Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/green-circle-decarbonize-technology-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Immutep Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/immutep-ltd/): On March 13, 2026, Immutep issued a press release “announcing that the Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) for the TACTI-004 Phase III study evaluating eftilagimod alfa (‘efti’) in patients in 1(st) line non-small cell lung cancer has recommended the discontinuation of the trial following a planned interim futility analysis in accordance with the study protocol.” In addition, the press release stated that, “based on its review of the available safety and efficacy data, the IDMC recommended that the trial be discontinued for futility” and that, accordingly, “enrolment in the study will be halted and the Company will implement an orderly wind down of the study, including appropriate patient follow up and site close out in accordance with regulatory and ethical obligations.”
- [Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/verrica-pharmaceuticals-inc/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duties by the directors and officers of Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ: VRCA).
- [Alight, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/alight-inc/): According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose facts concerning the true state of Alight’s growth potential and financial stability; notably, that Alight was not truly equipped to execute on its claimed potential and could not maintain its promised dividend as a result. Rather, Alight would require significantly higher compensation and incentive expenses to achieve the projections put forth by management. Throughout the class period, defendants announced disappointing results, reduced projections, and multiple goodwill impairments all while remaining confident in their ability to execute, drive growth, and continue to provide a dividend to their shareholders.
- [BGIN BLOCKCHAIN LIMITED](https://rosenlegal.com/case/bgin-blockchain-limited/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Acco Group Holdings Limited](https://rosenlegal.com/case/acco-group-holdings-limited/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [TechCreate Group Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/techcreate-group-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [rYojbaba Co., Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/ryojbaba-co-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Robot Consulting Co., Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/robot-consulting-co-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Happy City Holdings Limited](https://rosenlegal.com/case/happy-city-holdings-limited/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Apimeds Pharmaceuticals US, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/apimeds-pharmaceuticals-us-inc/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Everbright Digital Holding Limited](https://rosenlegal.com/case/everbright-digital-holding-limited/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Bluemount Holdings Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/60221/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Masonglory Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/masonglory-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [MaxsMaking Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/maxsmaking-inc/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Empro Group Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/empro-group-inc/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Five9, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/five9-inc/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duties by the directors and officers of Five9, Inc. (NASDAQ: FIVN).
- [Megan Holdings Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/megan-holdings-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Curanex Pharmaceuticals Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/curanex-pharmaceuticals-inc/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Waton Financial Limited](https://rosenlegal.com/case/waton-financial-limited/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [WF Holding Limited](https://rosenlegal.com/case/wf-holding-limited/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Epsium Enterprise Limited](https://rosenlegal.com/case/epsium-enterprise-limited/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Baiya International Group Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/baiya-international-group-inc/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Wetour Robotics Limited f/k/a Webus International Limited](https://rosenlegal.com/case/wetour-robotics-limited-f-k-a-webus-international-limited/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [BeLive Holdings](https://rosenlegal.com/case/belive-holdings/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [FatPipe Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/fatpipe-inc/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/cuprina-holdings-cayman-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Caring Brands Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/caring-brands-inc/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Elite Express Holding Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/elite-express-holding-inc/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Propanc Biopharma Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/propanc-biopharma-inc/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Huachen AI Parking Management Technology Holding Co., Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/huachen-ai-parking-management-technology-holding-co-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Skyline Builders Group Holding Limited](https://rosenlegal.com/case/skyline-builders-group-holding-limited/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [TJGC Group Limited](https://rosenlegal.com/case/tjgc-group-limited/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/cogent-communications-holdings-inc/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duties by the directors and officers of Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: CCOI).
- [Diginex Limited](https://rosenlegal.com/case/diginex-limited/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Decent Holding Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/decent-holding-inc/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Basel Medical Group Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/basel-medical-group-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [ODDITY Tech Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/oddity-tech-ltd/): According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
- [Kandal M Venture Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/kandal-m-venture-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [AsiaStrategy](https://rosenlegal.com/case/asiastrategy/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [LZ Technology Holdings Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/lz-technology-holdings-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Luda Technology Group Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/luda-technology-group-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Lianhe Sowell International Group Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/59848/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Camping World Holdings, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/camping-world-holdings-inc/): According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about Camping World Holdings' business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, defendants failed to disclose to investors that:
- [monday.com Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/monday-com-ltd/): According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or concealed material adverse facts concerning the true state of monday.com’s revenue expansion outlook; notably decelerating growth, reduced expansion momentum and extended sales cycles.
- [Wellgistics Health Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/wellgistics-health-inc/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [EPWK Holdings Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/epwk-holdings-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [3 E Network Technology Group Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/3-e-network-technology-group-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Park Ha Biological Technology Co. Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/park-ha-biological-technology-co-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [New Century Logistics (BVI) Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/new-century-logistics-bvi-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [NetClass Technology Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/netclass-technology-inc/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [INNEOVA Holdings Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/inneova-holdings-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [PTL Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/ptl-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Click Holdings Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/click-holdings-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Wellchange Holdings Co. Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/wellchange-holdings-co-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/aquestive-therapeutics-inc/): According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose the true state of Aquestive’s New Drug Application ("NDA") for Anaphylm; pertinently, Aquestive concealed or otherwise minimized the significance of the human factors involved in the use and deployment of its sublingual film, such as packaging, use, administration, and labeling.
- [Trip.com Group Limited](https://rosenlegal.com/case/trip-com-group-limited/): According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
- [Jinxin Technology Holding Company](https://rosenlegal.com/case/jinxin-technology-holding-company/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Linkers Industries Limited](https://rosenlegal.com/case/linkers-industries-limited/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Jupiter Neurosciences, Inc.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/jupiter-neurosciences-inc/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Millennium Group International Holdings Limited](https://rosenlegal.com/case/millennium-group-international-holdings-limited/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited](https://rosenlegal.com/case/wing-yip-food-holdings-group-limited/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited](https://rosenlegal.com/case/ming-shing-group-holdings-limited/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [ZJK Industrial Co., Ltd.](https://rosenlegal.com/case/zjk-industrial-co-ltd/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Premium Catering (Holdings) Limited](https://rosenlegal.com/case/premium-catering-holdings-limited/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.
- [Global Engine Group Holding Limited](https://rosenlegal.com/case/global-engine-group-holding-limited/): Rosen Law Firm is investigating potential civil securities claims.

## Attorneys
- [Matthew P. Siben](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/matthew-p-siben/): Mr. Siben has 25 years of experience prosecuting high-profile securities fraud class actions on behalf of individual institutional investors.
- [Joshua Cleveland](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/joshua-cleveland/): Mr. Cleveland graduated from Rutgers Law School in 2024, where he served as State Constitutional Law Editor of the Rutgers University Law Review. After law school, he clerked for the Honorable Michael J. Kassel in Camden County, New Jersey, assisting on matters involving complex civil litigation.
- [Olivia Simkins](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/olivia-simkins/): Ms. Simkins earned her JD from Tulane University School of Law in 2024.  She received her B.A. cum laude from Tulane University in 2017.
- [Izzy Fishbach](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/izzy-fishbach/): Izzy’s practice is focused on litigating securities and shareholder derivative matters. Izzy has previous class action litigation experience, having represented classes at a New Jersey-based firm, as well as general commercial litigation experience.
- [Henry Bloxenheim](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/henry-bloxenheim/): Mr. Bloxenheim received his J.D. from Columbia Law School and his B.A. in Political Science, summa cum laude, from Brooklyn College.
- [Luke Foley](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/lukefoley/): Mr. Foley received his J.D. from William and Mary Law School in 2022 and his B.A. from Syracuse University in 2016. He is admitted to practice in Maryland. Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Foley worked as the Law Clerk to the Honorable Barbara Buono Stanton in Passaic County, New Jersey.
- [Ian McDowell](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/ian-mcdowell/): Mr. McDowell graduated cum laude from the University of Richmond School of Law in 2022. He received his B.A. from James Madison University in 2016.  He was recognized by Best Lawyers as Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch for 2026.
- [Christie Buzzetti](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/christie-buzzetti/): Ms. Buzzetti received her J.D. from Brooklyn Law School in 2022 and her BA in Political Science from the University of California, Los Angeles.  She was recognized by Best Lawyers as Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch for 2026.
- [Robin Bronzaft Howald](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/robin-bronzaft-howald/): For more than 15 years, Robin’s practice has been focused upon securities litigation, serving as one of the lead attorneys in cases that achieved settlements of $250 million for injured investors, including Schleicher v. Wendt, 618 F.3d 679 (7th Cir. 2010) ($41.5 million), In re Mannkind Corp. Securities Litigation  (C.D. California) ($23 million); In re ECI Telecom Ltd. Securities Litigation (Eastern District of Virginia) ($21.75 million), In re Gilat Satellite Networks, Ltd. Securities Litigation (E.D.N.Y.) ($20 million), In re Musicmaker.com Securities Litigation, 2001 WL 34062431 (C.D. Cal. 2001) ($13.75 million), In re Puda Coal Inc. Securities Litigation (S.D.N.Y.) ($8.6 million following reconsideration of grant of summary judgment), Jenson v. Fiserv Trust Co., 256 F. App’x. 924 (9th Cir. 2007) ($8.5 million recovered for victims of a Ponzi scheme).
- [Laurence Rosen](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/laurence-rosen/): Mr. Rosen is founder of The Firm and managing attorney. He is one of the most experienced and successful securities class action attorneys in the United States, having successfully litigated and obtained multimillion-dollar recoveries in over 150 securities class actions over 30 years. Mr. Rosen is a 1988 graduate of the New York University School of Law. He earned an M.B.A. in finance and accounting at the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business and a B.A. in Economics from Emory University. Mr. Rosen served as a law clerk to the Honorable Stanley S. Brotman, Senior United States District Judge for the District of New Jersey. Mr. Rosen entered private practice as an associate at the law firm of Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom in New York City where he participated in a number of complex securities class action and derivative litigation matters. In 2001, Laurence founded The Rosen Law Firm to represent investors exclusively in securities fraud and corporate governance litigation. Mr. Rosen is admitted to practice law in New York, California, Florida, New Jersey, Arizona, and the District of Columbia. He is also admitted to practice before numerous United States District Courts throughout the country and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second, Third, Fourth, and Sixth Circuits.
- [Phillip Kim](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/phillip-kim/): Phil is a partner with decades of experience handling high-stakes securities litigation in federal and state courts across the country. Since joining The Rosen Law Firm in 2005, Phil has achieved numerous settlements in securities class actions for amounts significantly above the historical average recovery for similar cases.
- [Jacob A. Goldberg](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/jacob-a-goldberg/): For over thirty years, Jacob has litigated complex cases at the highest levels. He champions the rights of investors, employees, and consumers. In 2019-2026, Lawdragon named Jacob as one of 500 leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers. Courts have echoed that honor. For example, in Williams v. Globus Medical, Inc., Case No. 16-3607, Judge Michael A. Chagares of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit called “excellent” Jacob’s briefing and oral argument.  In Williams, in a matter of first impression, the Third Circuit  established that “a company may be liable under Section 10b for misleading investors when it describes as hypothetical a risk that has already come to fruition.”   Similarly, in Setzer v. Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc., Case No. 19-1095-cv (“In re Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.”) in which Jacob won reversal of a district court’s order, dismissing the case with prejudice, Judge Debra Ann Livingston of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit praised Jacob’s oral advocacy, commenting, “very well argued,” and Judge Richard C. Wesley added, “and nicely briefed.” The case is reported at 968 F.3d 204 (2d Cir. 2020). Subsequently, after thorough discovery, Jacob and his team settled the Omega Healthcare case for $30.75 million.   In addition to the Omega Healthcare case, among his other notable accomplishments in litigation under the federal securities laws are serving as one of the lead lawyers in In re: Ikon Office Solutions Securities Litigation, (E.D. Pennsylvania) which settled for $111 million then a record result for securities litigation in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Jacob has also served as lead lawyer in Meyer v. Concordia Int’l Corp. (S.D.N.Y.) ($9.25 million settlement); In re Tango, Inc. Sec. Litig. (D. Conn.) ($2.55 million settlement); In re Sundial Growers, Inc. Sec. Litig. (S.D.N.Y.) ($7 million settlement); In re Spectrum Pharma, Inc. Sec. Litig. (D. Nev.) ($2.995 million settlement).   In addition to serving in a leadership role in many other cases alleging violations of the federal securities laws, Jacob has litigated many cases under state corporation laws, against faithless officers and boards of directors both on behalf of shareholders, in the mergers and acquisitions context, and, derivatively, on behalf of corporations, to remedy harm to the corporation itself.  Among the most notable of these cases is Cohen v. Mirage Resorts, Inc., 119 Nev. 1, 62 P.3d 720 (2003), in which Jacob blazed a trail in mergers and acquisitions law under Nevada law.  In Cohen, for the first time, the Nevada Supreme Court held that shareholders were entitled to sue to enjoin or to rescind or to receive damages on a merger achieved through wrongful conduct that goes to the approval of the merger. In so holding, the Nevada Supreme Court rejected the contention that absent fraud, shareholders of Nevada corporations were relegated to statutory appraisal rights.   Jacob has also litigated cases under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act on behalf of employees who were injured when the value of their retirement savings collapsed while fiduciaries stood mute. Most notably, Jacob served as co-lead counsel in Bredthauer v. Lundstrom, et al., (D. Nebraska), recovering $4.5 million for participants in an employee stock ownership plan. Which lost all of its value upon the bankruptcy filing of TierOne Bank. Among Jacob’s other notable litigation achievements was serving as a lead lawyer in Streck v. Allergan, Inc., et al., (E.D. Pennsylvania), alleging violations of the False Claims Act. In the Streck litigation, Jacob co-led a team that defeated the motion to dismiss of four major pharmaceutical manufacturers even as the United States declined to intervene in the case.   Jacob received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Columbia University. He is a 1992 graduate of Temple University School of Law, cum laude. Jacob is admitted to practice in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the State of New York, the United States Supreme Court. Also the United States Courts of Appeals for the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Sixth, Ninth, and Eleventh  Circuits. And various United States District Courts. He is a dual citizen of the United States of America and the Republic of Ireland.    
- [Jonathan A. Saidel](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/jonathan-a-saidel/): Jon has had a long and distinguished career in Pennsylvania politics, as well as in the roles of attorney, accountant, and author. He served as Philadelphia city controller for four consecutive terms, each time earning reelection by a wide margin, and enacting financial reforms that have saved taxpayers upwards of $500 million. A lifelong resident of Northeast Philadelphia, Jon's tireless dedication to fiscal discipline reduced the city's tax burden and spurred economic development. Jon also pushed for important business tax incentives and expanded minority and small business lending, all of which have revitalized the city, helping it prosper and come back from the brink of bankruptcy in the early 1990s to become one of the most vibrant cities on the East Coast.
- [Jonathan Horne](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/jonathan-horne/): Jon has practiced securities litigation since 2011. He has served as lead counsel (i.e., with primary responsibility for either the overall litigation or its day-to-day development) in more than 25 successful securities class action lawsuits, which have collectively recovered more than $165 million.
- [Sara Fuks](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/sara-fuks/): Sara Fuks has spent the bulk of her 17-year legal career in the plaintiffs’ securities class action bar.  After graduating from law school, Sara joined the litigation department at a top national law firm, Dewey Ballantine, LLP, where she focused on general commercial litigation. Sara went on to prosecute numerous ERISA and securities class actions as an associate at Milberg LLP, learning that her passion lies in recovering losses for aggrieved investors. Sara joined the Rosen Law Firm in 2012 and became the first female partner at the firm in 2022. She has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for investors as lead or co-lead counsel.
- [Brian B. Alexander](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/brian-b-alexander/): Mr. Alexander focuses his practice on securities litigation. He has extensive experience litigating securities class actions against both domestic and foreign issuers in a variety of industries. Mr. Alexander’s successes include: $8.35 million recovery against Acer Therapeutics Inc. (U.S.-based pharmaceutical company); $6.2 million recovery against Sunlands Technology Group (China-based education company); $5 million recovery against Jumia Technologies AG (e-commerce platform that operates in Africa); and $2.2 million recovery against RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (U.S.-based hospitality company).
- [Joshua Baker](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/joshua-baker/): Mr. Baker has focused his practice on securities litigation and other investor class actions since 2017.  Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Baker practiced commercial litigation in New York.  He was recognized by Best Lawyers as Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch for 2025-2026.  In 2026, Lawdragon named Mr. Baker to its 500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers list.
- [Jing Chen](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/jing-chen/): Ms. Jing Chen is a leading practitioner in the plaintiffs’ securities class action bar prosecuting U.S.-listed Chinese companies. She has had significant involvement in numerous class actions and has been pivotal in obtaining over $300 million in settlements on behalf of investors. Ms. Chen has received a three-year Juris Master in China and a Juris Doctor in the U.S. and has extensive experience in international business transactions and U.S. securities regulation. Ms. Chen has leveraged her unique background to develop new cases, effectively locate evidence in challenging international jurisdictions, and provide strategically advantageous insight into legal and evidentiary issues while prosecuting class actions against U.S.-listed Chinese companies. Beyond the legal expertise she has built, Ms. Chen’s understanding of the intricacies of Chinese society has added great value toward providing quality service to the firm’s clients in relation to Chinese businesses.
- [Michael Cohen](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/michael-cohen/): Michael Cohen focuses his practice on securities litigation, helping investors recover money lost due to corporate malfeasance.  He was recognized by Best Lawyers as Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch, Securities, from 2023 through 2025.
- [Gonen Haklay](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/gonen-haklay/): As a young man, Gonen served as an infantryman in the Israel Defense Forces.  His combat service formed in him a steely self-discipline and humble self-confidence.  Upon returning to the United States, Gonen graduated from the University of Massachusetts in three years and then from Stanford Law School in 1995.  After several years as an associate attorney at a large Philadelphia law firm, Gonen joined the Philadelphia District Attorney’s office to try cases, and as an Assistant District Attorney, he did just that.  More quickly than most, the District Attorney elevated him to the Homicide Unit, where he prosecuted both capital and non-capital cases, obtaining convictions in every homicide jury trial he prosecuted.  He handled all aspects of murder cases, from investigation through trial and the sentencing phase.  Recognized by his peers for his exceptional ability to cross-examine both fact and expert witnesses and to synthesize complex issues of fact and law in both opening and closing arguments, Gonen successfully tried over 100 criminal jury trials and an even greater number of bench trials.
- [Ryan Hedrick](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/ryan-hedrick/): Mr. Hedrick received his J.D. from the University of Chicago in 2019. He joined the Rosen Law Firm in August 2019.  Mr. Hedrick focuses on securities and shareholder derivative litigation.
- [Leah Heifetz-Li](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/leah-heifetz-li/): Leah Heifetz-Li joined The Rosen Law Firm in 2017 and focuses her practice on securities class actions. She has extensive experience in class action litigation, having previously practiced at a large class action firm representing shareholders in merger and acquisition litigation as well as shareholder derivative actions.
- [Daniel Tyre-Karp](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/daniel-tyre-karp/): Mr. Tyre-Karp focuses his practice on securities litigation.  Prior to joining The Rosen Law Firm in May 2018, Mr. Tyre-Karp was a senior associate in the securities litigation and corporate governance group at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, where he advised corporate and individual clients on a variety of high-stakes regulatory and litigation matters in state and federal courts.
- [Ha Sung (Scott) Kim](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/ha-sung-scott-kim/): Mr. Kim received his J.D. from Columbia Law School in 2017.  Prior to joining the Rosen Law Firm, he had worked at the Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York, investigating potential investor fraud, and served as general counsel to a blockchain-based tech start-up.  Mr. Kim joined the Rosen Law Firm in January 2020, where he focuses on securities litigation.   He was recognized by Best Lawyers as Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch for 2026.  Mr. Kim focuses his practice on securities and fiduciary duty litigation.
- [Yu Shi](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/yu-shi/): Yu Shi focuses his practice on securities litigation, helping aggrieved investors recover money lost due to corporate malfeasance. In 2022, Law360 recognized Mr. Shi as one of the nation’s top securities attorneys under 40. Mr. Shi was one of only five attorneys – from both plaintiff and defense side – that year to receive such honor. In 2024-26, Lawdragon named Mr. Shi to its 500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers list.  Mr. Shi has also been selected to Super Lawyers each year since 2018.
- [Jonathan Stern](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/jonathan-stern/): Jonathan has acted as lead attorney in actions in numerous securities class actions, including actions against Zillow Group, Inc., Blue Earth, Inc., Trulieve, Inc., Walter Investment Management, Inc., Longeveron, Inc., State Street, Inc., Electronic Game Card, Inc., Pretium Resources, Inc., Paypal Holdings, Inc., Sunpower Corporation, Cellceutix Corporation, QRX Pharma LTD, He has also litigated claims against several foreign companies, including Montage Technology Company and Lihua International, Inc., and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation, which are based in the People’s Republic of China, Amaya, Inc., based in Canada, CD Projekt, based in Warsaw, Deutsche Bank, based in Germany, and Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, based in the Republic of Korea. Amaya, CD Projekt, Semiconductor Manufacturing International, and Deutsche Bank were involved in claims against companies whose securities were listed both in the United States and abroad. Jonathan also took several depositions using translators in the Republic of Korea in connection with the Magnachip case. Jonathan also acted as lead attorney in an action against the auditors of Electronic Game Card. Jonathan also acted as lead counsel in a successful derivative action against the directors, officers, and controlling shareholders of SeaWorld. Jonathan’s settlement in the Longeveron action also resolved claims against Longeveron’s underwriters.  Jonathan also has experience practicing in Bankruptcy Court, successfully arguing for a partial lifting of the automatic stay in a case against F-Squared Inc. so that securities claims could proceed in Federal Court.
- [Erica Stone](https://rosenlegal.com/attorneys/erica-stone/): Ms. Stone joined the Rosen Law Firm in September 2013.  Ms. Stone focuses her practice on securities litigation and shareholder derivative litigation. Recognized for her commitment to assisting clients, Ms. Stone was voted to Super Lawyers' New York Metro Rising Star list in 2021-2023.  In 2024-2025, Ms. Stone was selected to Super Lawyers.  Ms. Stone was recognized by Best Lawyers as Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch for 2025-26.  In 2026, Lawdragon named Ms. Stone to its 500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers list.

## Successes
- [Yang v. Tibet Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. 14-cv-3538](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/yang-v-tibet-pharmaceuticals-inc-no-14-cv-3538/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The complaint alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with material misrepresentations in the Company’s Registration Statement and Prospectus. Plaintiffs and the underwriters have agreed to settle their claims for $14 million proof of claim in bankruptcy court.
- [Turocy v. El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc., No. CV-15-1343-DOC](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/turocy-v-el-pollo-loco-holdings-inc-no-cv-15-1343-doc/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Class Counsel in this certified class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information. The parties settled the action for $20 million in cash.
- [Deering v. Galena Biopharma, Inc., No. 3:14-cv-00367-SI (Partial Settlement)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/deering-v-galena-biopharma-inc-no-314-cv-00367-si-partial-settlement/): The Rosen Law Firm is currently serving as co-Lead Counsel in this class action pending in the U.S. District Court for District of Oregon. The complaint alleges violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company concealing an undisclosed stock promotion scheme. The firm secured a partial settlement for $20 million consisting of $19 million in cash and $1 million in stock. The case continues against other defendants.
- [Beck v. Walter Investment Management, No. 14-cv-20880-UU](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/beck-v-walter-investment-management-no-14-cv-20880-uu/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for Southern District of Florida. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company concealing its true financial condition. The parties settled the action for $24 million in cash.
- [Menaldi v. Och-Ziff Capital Management Group LLC, No. 14-CV-3251 (JPO)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/menaldi-v-och-ziff-capital-management-group-llc-no-14-cv-3251-jpo/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Class Counsel in this certified class action in the U.S. District Court for Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information. The parties settled this action for $28.75 million in cash.
- [Hayes v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corp., No. 12-CV-1160-JST](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/hayes-v-magnachip-semiconductor-corp-no-12-cv-1160-jst/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Class Counsel in this certified class action in the U.S. District Court for Northern District of California. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of false financial statements. The parties settled this action for $29.7 million in cash.
- [In re Silver Wheaton Corp. Securities Litigation, No. 15-cv-5146-CAS](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-silver-wheaton-corp-securities-litigation-no-15-cv-5146-cas/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Class Counsel in this certified class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements. This parties settled this action for $41.5 million in cash.
- [In re USA Technologies, Inc. Sec. Litig., No. 19-cv-4565-JHS](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-usa-technologies-inc-sec-litig-no-19-cv-4565-jhs/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole lead counsel in this consolidated class action in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and §§11b and 15 of the Securities Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and financial statements. The parties settled the action for $15.3 million in cash.
- [Checkman v. Allegiant Travel Co., No. 18-cv-1758-APG-BNW](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/checkman-v-allegiant-travel-co-no-18-cv-1758-apg-bnw/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole lead counsel in this class action in U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information.  The parties settled this action for $4 million in cash.
- [In re Akers Biosciences, Inc. Sec. Litig., No. 18-cv-10521 (ES) (CLW)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-akers-biosciences-inc-sec-litig-no-18-cv-10521-es-clw/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole lead counsel in this consolidated class action in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information. The parties agreed to settle this action for $2.25 million in cash.
- [Hrasok v. Kraton Corporation, No. 18-CV-591](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/hrasok-v-kraton-corporation-no-18-cv-591/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information.  The parties agreed to settle this action for $1.5 million in cash.
- [Weinstein v. RMG Networks Holding Corporation, C.A. 2018-0210-AGB](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/weinstein-v-rmg-networks-holding-corporation-c-a-2018-0210-agb/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the Court of Chancery of State of Delaware, brought in connection with a “going private” transaction.  The parties settled this action for $1.5 million in additional compensation to shareholders.
- [Perez v. Izea, Inc., No. 18-cv-2784-SVW-GJS](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/perez-v-izea-inc-no-18-cv-2784-svw-gjs/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial information. The parties agreed to settle this action for $1.2 million in cash.
- [Kistenmacher v. Atchison (SeaWorld Entertainment Inc.), No. 10437-VCS](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/kistenmacher-v-atchison-seaworld-entertainment-inc-no-10437-vcs/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-lead counsel in this shareholder derivative action in the Chancery Court for the State of Delaware.  The firm secured a $12.5 million cash payment to SeaWorld along with valuable corporate governance reforms.
- [Delorosa v. State Street, 17-cv-11155-NMG](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/delorosa-v-state-street-17-cv-11155-nmg/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for District of Massachusetts. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information. The parties agreed to settle this action for $4.9 million in cash.
- [In re Sequans Communications Securities Litigation, No.  17-cv-4665 (FB)(SJB)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-sequans-communications-securities-litigation-no-17-cv-4665-fbsjb/): The Rosen Law Firm was Co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.  The complaint alleged violations of §10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act out of the Company’s misstatements about its true financial condition and prospects.  The parties settled this action for $2.75 million in cash.
- [In re Akari Therapeutics PLC Securities Litigation, No. 17-cv-3577 (KPF)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-akari-therapeutics-plc-securities-litigation-no-17-cv-3577-kpf/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading statements about the results of a clinical study. The parties settled this case for $2.7 million in cash.
- [Moleski v. Tangoe, Inc., No. 3:17-cv-00146](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/moleski-v-tangoe-inc-no-317-cv-00146/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements. The parties settled this action for $2.55 million in cash.
- [Shapiro v. Alliance MMA, Inc., No. 17-CV-2583 (RBK)(AMD)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/shapiro-v-alliance-mma-inc-no-17-cv-2583-rbkamd/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.  The complaint alleged violations of §§11b and 15(a) of the Securities Act arising out of the company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements in connection with the company’s initial public offering. The parties settled this action for $1.55 million in cash.
- [Allen v. Pixarbio Corp., No. 2:17-cv-496-CCC-SM](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/allen-v-pixarbio-corp-no-217-cv-496-ccc-sm/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for District of New Jersey.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information.  The parties agreed to settle this case for $750,000 in cash.
- [In re Stemline Therapeutics, Inc. Securities Litigation, 17-cv-832 (PAC)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-stemline-therapeutics-inc-securities-litigation-17-cv-832-pac/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.  Following the dismissal of the action and while on appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the parties settled this action for $625,000 in cash.
- [In re comScore, Inc. Virginia Shareholder Derivative Litigation, No. CL-2016-9465](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-comscore-inc-virginia-shareholder-derivative-litigation-no-cl-2016-9465/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-lead counsel in this shareholder derivative action in the Virginia state court.  The firm helped secure a global settlement of this action and a related federal derivative action consisting of a $10 million cash payment to comScore along with extensive corporate governance reforms.
- [Parmelee v. Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc., No. 3:16-cv-783-K](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/parmelee-v-santander-consumer-usa-holdings-inc-no-316-cv-783-k/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information. The parties agreed to settle this case for $9.5 million in cash.
- [Meyer v. Concordia International Corp., No. 16-cv-6467 (RMB)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/meyer-v-concordia-international-corp-no-16-cv-6467-rmb/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information. The parties agreed to settle this case for $9.25 million in cash.
- [Carmack v. Amaya, Inc., No. 16-cv-1884-JHR-JS](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/carmack-v-amaya-inc-no-16-cv-1884-jhr-js/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information. The parties settled this action for $5.75 million in cash.
- [In re Spectrum Pharms. Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 16-cv-2279-RFP-GWF](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-spectrum-pharms-inc-securities-litigation-no-16-cv-2279-rfp-gwf/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada.  The complaint alleged violations of the Exchange Act in connection with the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information.   Plaintiffs settled this action for $2.995 million in cash.
- [Hosey v. Twitter, Inc., No. 16-CIV-02228](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/hosey-v-twitter-inc-no-16-civ-02228/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the Superior Court of the State of California in San Mateo County.  The complaint alleged violations of §§11 of the Securities Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information.  The parties settled this action for $2.5 million in cash.
- [Crandall v. PTC Inc., No. 16-cv-10471-WGY](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/crandall-v-ptc-inc-no-16-cv-10471-wgy/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for District of Massachusetts. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and certain violations of the Securities Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading statements about the Company’s true financial condition. The parties agreed to settle this action for $2.1 million in cash.
- [In re DS Healthcare Group, Inc. Sec. Litig., No. 16-60661-CIV-DIMITROULEAS](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-ds-healthcare-group-inc-sec-litig-no-16-60661-civ-dimitrouleas/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information. The parties agreed to settle this action for $2.1 million in cash.
- [Ford v. Natural Health Trends Corp., No. 16-00255 TJH (AFM)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/ford-v-natural-health-trends-corp-no-16-00255-tjh-afm/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information. The parties agreed to settle this action for $1.75 million in cash.
- [Springer v. Code Rebel Corp., No. 16-cv-3492 (AJN)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/springer-v-code-rebel-corp-no-16-cv-3492-ajn/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and counsel in a related case in California Superior Court. The actions alleged violations of the Exchange Act and Securities Act violations, respectively. Following the bankruptcy of the Company, the parties settled both actions for $1.415 million.
- [Balon v. Agria, Inc., No. 16-8376 (SDW)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/balon-v-agria-inc-no-16-8376-sdw/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The complaint alleged violation of §10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act out of the Company’s manipulation of its stock price. The parties settled this case for $1.3 million in cash.
- [Scalfani v. Misonix Inc., No. 16-cv-5215 (ADS) (AKT)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/scalfani-v-misonix-inc-no-16-cv-5215-ads-akt/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The complaint alleged violations of §§ 10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of false financial statements. The parties have settled this action for $500,000 in cash—resulting in a recovery of nearly 100% of damages.
- [Christine Asia Co Ltd. v. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., No. 15-md-2631 (CM) (SDA)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/christine-asia-co-ltd-v-alibaba-group-holding-ltd-no-15-md-2631-cm-sda-2/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Class Counsel in this multidistrict certified class action in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information.  The parties settled this action for $250 million in cash.
- [Pirnik v. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, N.V., 15-CV-7199 (JMF)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/pirnik-v-fiat-chrysler-automobiles-n-v-15-cv-7199-jmf/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Class Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading statements about its true business condition. The parties settled this action for $110 million in cash.
- [In re IDreamSky Technology Limited Securities Litigation, No. 15-cv-2514 (JPO)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-idreamsky-technology-limited-securities-litigation-no-15-cv-2514-jpo/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act §§ 11 and 20(a) of the Securities Act and arising out of the issuance of misleading business information. The parties settled this case for $4.15 million in cash.
- [In re IsoRay, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 15-cv-5046-LRD](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-isoray-inc-securities-litigation-no-15-cv-5046-lrd/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for Eastern District of Washington. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company misstating certain study results relating to the Company’s products. The parties settled this action for $3,537,500 in cash.
- [Napoli v. Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., CV-3474-TJH](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/napoli-v-ampio-pharmaceuticals-inc-cv-3474-tjh/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false statements regarding the clinical testing of one its products. The parties settled this action for $3.4 million in cash.
- [Meruelo Capital Partners 2, LLC et al. v. Wedbush Morgan Securities, Inc., No. BC 352498](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/meruelo-capital-partners-2-llc-et-al-v-wedbush-morgan-securities-inc-no-bc-352498/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-counsel to plaintiffs in this action brought in California Superior Court, Los Angeles County for violations of the California State securities laws against the securities issuer and broker-dealer in connection with the sale of $2.5 million worth of securities. On the eve of trial, plaintiffs settled the claims against the issuer for a cash payment of $1 million. Following an eight day jury trial, Plaintiffs obtained a jury verdict in their favor and against the underwriter for over $2.2 million (which included prejudgment interest). In sum, plaintiffs recovered over $3.2 million, which represented 100% of plaintiffs’ principal investment of $2.5 million and over $700,000 in prejudgment interest.
- [Van Wingerden v. Cadiz, Inc., No. CV-15-3080-JAK-JEM](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/van-wingerden-v-cadiz-inc-no-cv-15-3080-jak-jem/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for Central District of California. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements. The parties settled this action for $3 million in cash.
- [Pham v. China Finance Online Co. Limited, No. CV 15-CV-7894 (RMB)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/pham-v-china-finance-online-co-limited-no-cv-15-cv-7894-rmb/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements. The parties settled this action for $3 million in cash.
- [Vaccaro v. New Source Energy Partners LP, No. 15-CV-8954 (KMW)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/vaccaro-v-new-source-energy-partners-lp-no-15-cv-8954-kmw/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged violations of §§11 and 15 of the Securities Act arising out of the company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information. The parties settled this action for $2.85 million in cash.
- [Tapia-Matos v. Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd., No. 15-CV-6726 (JMF)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/tapia-matos-v-caesarstone-sdot-yam-ltd-no-15-cv-6726-jmf/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading statements about the Company’s true financial condition and business prospects. The parties agreed to settle this action for $2.2 million in cash.
- [Pankowski v. BlueNRGY Group Ltd, f/k/a CBD Energy Ltd., No. 4:15-cv-1668](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/pankowski-v-bluenrgy-group-ltd-f-k-a-cbd-energy-ltd-no-415-cv-1668/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The complaint alleged violations Securities Act and Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false financial statements. The parties agreed to settle this action for $1.5 million in cash.
- [Tran v. ERBA Diagnostics, Inc., No. 15-cv-24440](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/tran-v-erba-diagnostics-inc-no-15-cv-24440/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action on appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements. While on appeal following the dismissal of the case, the parties settled the action for $1.215 million in cash.
- [Knox v. Yingli Green Energy Holding Co. Ltd., No. 2:15-cv-4003](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/knox-v-yingli-green-energy-holding-co-ltd-no-215-cv-4003/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false financial statements. While on appeal following the dismissal of the case, the parties agreed to settle the action for $1.2 million in cash.
- [Garcia v. Lentuo International, Inc., CV-15-1862-MWF (MRWx)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/garcia-v-lentuo-international-inc-cv-15-1862-mwf-mrwx/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleged violations of the Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements. The parties settled this action for $1 million in cash.
- [Xu v. ChinaCache International Holdings, Ltd., No. CV 15-7952-CAS](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/xu-v-chinacache-international-holdings-ltd-no-cv-15-7952-cas/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for Central District of California. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information. While on appeal following the dismissal of the case, the parties agreed to settle the action for $950,000 in cash.
- [The BoxLot Company v. InfoSpace, Inc., No. GIC 779231](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/the-boxlot-company-v-infospace-inc-no-gic-779231/): The Rosen Law Firm was plaintiff’s counsel for this action filed in California Superior Court, San Diego County which arose from the aborted merger agreement and ultimate sale of The BoxLot Company’s assets to InfoSpace. The action alleged violations of California securities laws (Cal. Corp. Code §25400 & §25401) and common laws and sought damages of $92.8 million from InfoSpace and its CEO, Naveen Jain. The case settled favorably for plaintiffs for a confidential amount.
- [In re Forcefield Energy, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 15-cv-3020 (NRB)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-forcefield-energy-inc-securities-litigation-no-15-cv-3020-nrb/): The Rosen Law Firm was Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading information. The parties agreed to settle this case for $414,500.
- [In re Montage Technology Group Ltd Securities Litigation, No. 3:2014-cv-0722 (SI)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-montage-technology-group-ltd-securities-litigation-no-32014-cv-0722-si/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleged violations of §§ 10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of false statements relating to certain undisclosed related party transactions and the Company’s revenue. The parties agreed to settle this action for $7.25 million in cash.
- [Miller v. Global Geophysical Services, No. 14-CV-708](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/miller-v-global-geophysical-services-no-14-cv-708/): The Rosen Law Firm was Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for Southern of Texas.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act arising out a financial restatement.  The parties agreed to settle this case for $5.3 million in cash.
- [Kelsey v. Textura Corporation, No. 14 C 7837](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/kelsey-v-textura-corporation-no-14-c-7837/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for Northern District of Illinois. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out allegations that the Company misstated its true financial condition. The parties settled this action for $3.3 million in cash.
- [Ding v. Roka Bioscience, Inc., No. 14-8020 (FLW)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/ding-v-roka-bioscience-inc-no-14-8020-flw/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for District of New Jersey. The complaint alleges violations of §§11 and 15 of the Securities Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information. The parties agreed to settle this case for $3.275 million in cash.
- [Gauquie v. Albany Molecular Research, No. 14-CV-6637 (FB) (SMG)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/gauquie-v-albany-molecular-research-no-14-cv-6637-fb-smg/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The complaint alleged violation of §10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act out of the Company’s misstatements about its true financial condition and prospects. The parties settled this action for $2.868 million.
- [In re Lihua International, Inc. Sec. Litig., No. 14-CV-5037 (RA)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-lihua-international-inc-sec-litig-no-14-cv-5037-ra/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements. The collective settlement of the class action and consolidated derivative actions are $2.865 million in cash.
- [Romero v. Growlife, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-03015-CAS (JEMx)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/romero-v-growlife-inc-no-214-cv-03015-cas-jemx/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising the issuance of false statements concerning the Company’s true financial condition.  The parties agreed to settle this action for total consideration of $2.7 million, comprised of $700,000 in cash and $2 million in stock.
- [Pena v. iBio, Inc., 14-CV-1343-RGA](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/pena-v-ibio-inc-14-cv-1343-rga-2/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out misstatements and omissions relating to the Company’s purported involvement with an Ebola treatment. The parties settled this action for $1.875 million in cash.
- [Fouladian v. Busybox.com, Inc., No. BC 248048](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/fouladian-v-busybox-com-inc-no-bc-248048/): The Rosen Law Firm was Co-Lead Counsel in this class action brought in California Superior Court, Los Angeles County.  The action arose from a $12.8 million initial public offering of securities by the defendant issuer and underwriter. California and federal securities laws claims (Cal. Corp. Code §25401 and §11 of 1933 Act) were brought on behalf of a nationwide class of public offering investors. The Court approved a $1.0 million cash settlement to a nationwide class of investors.
- [Pollock v. China Ceramics Co. Ltd, No. 1:14-cv-4100 (VSB)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/pollock-v-china-ceramics-co-ltd-no-114-cv-4100-vsb/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for Southern District of New York.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s lack of internal controls. The parties settled this action for $850,000, consisting of $310,000 in cash and $540,000 in stock.
- [Berry v. KIOR, Inc., No. 13-CV-2443](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/berry-v-kior-inc-no-13-cv-2443/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements. The parties settled this action for $4.5 million in cash.
- [Fitzpatrick v. Uni-Pixel, Inc., No. 13-CV-01649](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/fitzpatrick-v-uni-pixel-inc-no-13-cv-01649/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company concealing its true financial condition.  The parties settled this action for $4.5 million consisting of $2.35 million in cash and $2.15 million in stock.
- [In re L&L Energy, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 13-CV-6704 (RA)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-ll-energy-inc-securities-litigation-no-13-cv-6704-ra/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.  The complaint alleged violations of §§ 10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of false financial statements.  The parties settled this action for $3.5 million in cash.
- [Sood v. Catalyst Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc., No. 13-CV-23878-UU](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/sood-v-catalyst-pharmaceutical-partners-inc-no-13-cv-23878-uu/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole lead counsel in this class action filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The complaint alleged that the Company failed to disclose material facts about its primary drug candidate.  The parties agreed to settle this action for $3.5 million in cash.
- [Cheung v. Keyuan Petrochemicals, Inc., No. 13-cv-6057 (PAC)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/cheung-v-keyuan-petrochemicals-inc-no-13-cv-6057-pac/): The Rosen Law firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged violations of §§ 10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with the Company’s failure to disclose material related party transactions in periodic reports it filed with the SEC.  The parties settled this action for $2.65 million in cash.  Separately, in the related case Omanoff v. Patrizio & Zhao LLC, No. 2:14-cv-723-FSH-JBC, The Rosen Law Firm was sole lead counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.  The complaint alleged that Patrizio & Zhao, LLC, as auditor for Keyuan Petrochemicals, Inc., issued materially false and misleading audit opinions.  The parties have settled this action for $850,000 in cash.  The total recovery for Keyuan investors was $3.5 million.
- [Abrams v. MiMedx Group, Inc., No. 1:13-cv-03074-TWT](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/abrams-v-mimedx-group-inc-no-113-cv-03074-twt/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.  The complaint alleged violations of §§ 10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of false statements relating the regulatory compliance of its products. The parties settled this action for $2.979 million.
- [In re Lightinthebox Holding Co., Ltd., 13-CV-6016 (VEC)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-lightinthebox-holding-co-ltd-13-cv-6016-vec/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for Southern District of New York.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company concealing its true financial condition. The parties agreed to settle this action for $1.55 million in cash.
- [Lee v. Active Power, Inc., No. 1:13-cv-00797](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/lee-v-active-power-inc-no-113-cv-00797/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas.  The complaint alleged violations of §§ 10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of false statements relating to a purported distribution agreement with a major information technology provider.  The parties agreed to settle this action for $1.5 million.
- [Simmons v. FAB Universal Corp., No. 13-CV-8216 (RWS)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/simmons-v-fab-universal-corp-no-13-cv-8216-rws/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for Southern District of New York.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company concealing its true financial condition.  The parties agreed to settle this action for $1.5 million in cash.
- [Singh v. Tri-Tech Holding, Inc., No. 13-CV-9031 (KMW)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/singh-v-tri-tech-holding-inc-no-13-cv-9031-kmw/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for Southern District of New York.  The complaint alleged violations of §10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company concealing its true financial condition. The parties settled this action for $975,000 in cash.
- [In re Silvercorp Metals, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 12-CV-9456 (JSR)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-silvercorp-metals-inc-securities-litigation-no-12-cv-9456-jsr/): The Rosen Law Firm was counsel to lead plaintiff in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for Southern District of New York.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and  20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial information. The parties agreed to settle this action for $14 million in cash.
- [Campton v. Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc., No. 12-CV-2196](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/campton-v-ignite-restaurant-group-inc-no-12-cv-2196-2/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas.  The complaint alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with material misrepresentations in the Company’s Registration Statement and Prospectus issued for the company’s IPO.  The parties agreed to the settle this action for $1.8 million in cash.
- [Campton v. Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc., No. 12-CV-2196](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/campton-v-ignite-restaurant-group-inc-no-12-cv-2196/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The complaint alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with material misrepresentations in the Company’s Registration Statement and Prospectus issued for the company’s IPO. The parties settled this action for $1.8 million in cash.
- [Guimetla v. Ambow Education Holding Ltd., No. CV-12-5062-PSG (AJWx)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/guimetla-v-ambow-education-holding-ltd-no-cv-12-5062-psg-ajwx/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.  The complaint alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements.  The parties agreed to settle this action for $1.5 million.
- [Chanticleer Holdings, Inc., No. 12-CV-81123-JIC](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/chanticleer-holdings-inc-no-12-cv-81123-jic/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.  The complaint alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with material misrepresentations in the Company’s Registration Statement and Prospectus issued for the Company’s public offering of common stock and warrants.  The parties have agreed to settle this action for $850,000 in cash.
- [In re Puda Coal Securities Litigation, No. 11-CV-2598 (DLC) (Partial Settlement)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-puda-coal-securities-litigation-no-11-cv-2598-dlc-partial-settlement/): The Rosen Law Firm is currently serving as co-Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.  The complaint alleges violations of the Exchange Act and Securities Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements.  The firm secured a $8.7 million certain parties.  The case continues against other defendants.
- [Blitz v. AgFeed Industries, No. 3:11-0992](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/blitz-v-agfeed-industries-no-311-0992/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial information. The parties agreed to settle this action for $7 million in cash.
- [Snellink v. Universal Travel Group, Inc., Case No.11-CV-2164](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/snellink-v-universal-travel-group-inc-case-no-11-cv-2164/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising the issuance of false statements concerning the Company’s true financial condition. The parties settled this action for $4.075 million.
- [Stanger v. China Electric Motor, Inc., No. CV 11-2794-R (AGRx)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/stanger-v-china-electric-motor-inc-no-cv-11-2794-r-agrx/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.  The complaint alleged violations of §§ 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with the Company’s $22.5 million initial public offering.  The parties agreed to settle this action for $3,778,333.33 in cash.
- [Rose v. Deer Consumer Products, Inc., No. CV11-3701 –DMG (MRWx)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/rose-v-deer-consumer-products-inc-no-cv11-3701-dmg-mrwx/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising from the issuance of false statements concerning the Company’s true financial condition.  Plaintiffs settled their claims against Deer and its auditor through two settlements totaling $3.55 million in cash.
- [Nguyen v. Radient Pharmaceuticals Corporation, No. CV11-0405-DOC (MLGx)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/nguyen-v-radient-pharmaceuticals-corporation-no-cv11-0405-doc-mlgx/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court of the Central District of California.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the issuance of false statements concerning the Company’s clinical trial involving its principal product.  The parties agreed to settle this action for $2.5 million in cash.
- [Kubala v. SkyPeople Fruit Juice, No. 11-CV-2700 (PKC)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/kubala-v-skypeople-fruit-juice-no-11-cv-2700-pkc/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act out of the Company’s failure to disclose material related party transactions that rendered the Company’s financial statements false.  The parties agreed to settle this action for $2.2 million in cash.
- [Rose v. Deer Consumer Products, Inc., No. CV11-3701 –DMG (MRWx) (Partial Settlement)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/rose-v-deer-consumer-products-inc-no-cv11-3701-dmg-mrwx-partial-settlement/): The Rosen Law Firm is currently serving as sole Lead Counsel in this class action pending in the U.S. District Court of the Central District of California.  The complaint alleges violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising the issuance of false statements concerning the Company’s true financial condition.  The parties agreed to a partial settlement for $2.125 million in cash.  The case is ongoing against Deer’s auditor.
- [Snellink v. Gulf Resources, Inc., No.CV11-3722-ODW (MRWx)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/snellink-v-gulf-resources-inc-no-cv11-3722-odw-mrwx/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.  The complaint alleged violations of §§ 10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s failure to disclose the related party nature of certain transactions, and the Company’s issuance of false financial statements.  The parties agreed to settle this action for $2.125 million in cash.
- [Katz v. China Century Dragon Media, Inc., No. CV 11-02769 JAK (SSx)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/katz-v-china-century-dragon-media-inc-no-cv-11-02769-jak-ssx/): The Rosen Law Firm is currently serving as sole Lead Counsel in this class action pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.  The complaint alleges violations of §§ 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements.  Following entry of default against the issuer and certification of the class, the non-issuer defendants and Plaintiffs have preliminarily agreed to resolve the claims against the non-issuer defendants for $778,333.33, subject to court approval.
- [In re China Intelligent Lighting and Electronics, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 2:11-CV-02768 PSG (SSx)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-china-intelligent-lighting-and-electronics-inc-securities-litigation-no-211-cv-02768-psg-ssx/): The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleged violations of §§ 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements.  The parties agreed to partially settle this action for $631,600 in cash.  A default judgment was obtained against the issuer.
- [Hufnagle v. RINO International Corporation, No. CV 10-8695-DDP](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/hufnagle-v-rino-international-corporation-no-cv-10-8695-ddp/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading statements of revenue and earnings.  The parties settled this action against the company and its auditor for a total of $8,685,000 in cash.
- [Cole v. Duoyuan Printing, Inc., Case No. 10-CV-7325(GBD)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/cole-v-duoyuan-printing-inc-case-no-10-cv-7325gbd/): The Rosen Law Firm was Co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.  The complaint alleged violations of §§ 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading statements about the Company’s true financial condition and adequacy of the Company’s internal controls. Plaintiffs and the issuer defendants preliminarily agreed to a partial settlement of $4.3 million cash payment to class members.  Plaintiffs and the underwriters agreed to a separate $1,893,750 cash payment to class members. The total settlement was $6,193,750 in cash.
- [Bensley v. FalconStor Software, Inc., No. 10-CV-4672 (ERK) (CLP)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/bensley-v-falconstor-software-inc-no-10-cv-4672-erk-clp/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading statements about the Company’s true financial and business condition.  The parties agreed to settle this action for $5 million in cash.
- [Ray v. TierOne Corporation, No. 10CV199](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/ray-v-tierone-corporation-no-10cv199/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action brought in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading statements of earnings and the Company’s banking operations and business.  The parties settled this action for $3.1 million in cash.
- [In re China Education Alliance, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. C 10-9239-CAS (JCx)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-china-education-alliance-inc-securities-litigation-no-c-10-9239-cas-jcx/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.  The complaint alleges violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading statements of revenue and earnings.  The parties settled this action for $2.425 million in cash.
- [Henning v. Orient Paper, Inc., No. CV 10-5887-VBF (AJWx)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/henning-v-orient-paper-inc-no-cv-10-5887-vbf-ajwx/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.  The complaint alleges violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and certain violations of the Securities Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading statements about the Company’s true financial condition and business prospects.  The parties settled this action for $2 million in cash.
- [Petrie v. Electronic Game Card, Inc., No. SACV 10-0252-DOC (RNBx)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/petrie-v-electronic-game-card-inc-no-sacv-10-0252-doc-rnbx/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Following dismissal of the complaint by the district court, the Rosen Firm obtained a reversal of the dismissal from U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements in violation of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and the Company’s publicly stated internal policies. The parties settled this case for $1.755 million in cash.
- [Hayden v. Wang, et al., No. Civ. 518333](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/hayden-v-wang-et-al-no-civ-518333/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole lead counsel in this class action in the California Superior Court of San Mateo County brought on behalf of purchasers of Worldwide Energy & Manufacturing USA, Inc. common stock in two private placements.  The Complaint alleged that the offering documents were materially false.  The parties settled this action for $1,615,000 in cash.
- [Vandevelde v. China Natural Gas, Inc., No. 10-728-SLR](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/vandevelde-v-china-natural-gas-inc-no-10-728-slr/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in the class action pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements. Plaintiffs settled this action for $1.5 million in cash.
- [Ansell v. National Lampoon, Inc., No. CV10-9292-PA (AGRx)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/ansell-v-national-lampoon-inc-no-cv10-9292-pa-agrx/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of a market manipulation scheme involving National Lampoon’s common stock.  The parties agreed to settle this action for $1 million in cash.
- [Teague v. Alternate Energy Holdings, Inc., No. 10-CV-634-BLW](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/teague-v-alternate-energy-holdings-inc-no-10-cv-634-blw/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements and business condition.  The parties settled this action for $450,000.
- [In re Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 2:09-CV-5416-DOC (RZx)](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/in-re-skilled-healthcare-group-inc-securities-litigation-no-209-cv-5416-doc-rzx/): The Rosen Law Firm was Co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleged violations of the §§ 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading statements of revenue and earnings. Plaintiffs settled this action for $3 million in cash.
- [Burritt v. Nutracea, Inc., No. CV-09-00406-PHX-FJM](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/burritt-v-nutracea-inc-no-cv-09-00406-phx-fjm/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. This action alleged violations of §§ 10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Arizona securities laws in connection with the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading statements of earnings and revenues. During the pendency of the Company’s bankruptcy, Plaintiffs settled this action for $1.5 million in cash and a remainder interest of 50% of the issuer’s directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy.
- [Press v. Delstaff LLC, No. MSC 09-01051](https://rosenlegal.com/successes/press-v-delstaff-llc-no-msc-09-01051/): The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the California Superior Court for Contra Costa County, brought in connection with a “going private” transaction valued at $1.25/share for the 6.4 million shares implicated in the transaction. The parties settled this action for $1,642,500 in additional compensation to shareholders.