I trusted Antigravity and a local LLM with the same office tasks, and only one respected my files

Agentic's introduction of Antigravity, an AI tool capable of performing office tasks, highlights a crucial distinction in how different AI models interact with existing files. The article reveals that Antigravity respected the author's files, whereas a local LLM did not, underscoring the importance of choosing the right AI tool for tasks that involve sensitive or pre-existing data. This development has significant implications for website owners who are considering integrating AI tools into their workflows. As AI-generated content becomes more prevalent, website owners must be mindful of how different AI models interact with their existing content and files. The fact that Antigravity respected the author's files suggests that it may be a more reliable choice for tasks that require careful handling of sensitive data. To mitigate potential risks, website owners should take the following steps: first, carefully evaluate the track record of any AI tool before integrating it into their workflow; second, implement robust tracking and monitoring of AI bot traffic to detect any potential issues with file handling; and third, regularly review and update their llms.txt files to ensure that they are accurately reflecting the AI tools being used on their site.