Less panic patching, more precision

Original Article Summary
In this newsletter, Thor breaks down why you should stop relying solely on CVSS and start using EPSS and GCVE to focus your patching efforts on the threats that actually matter.
Read full article at Talosintelligence.comâ¨Our Analysis
Talos Intelligence's publication of a newsletter emphasizing the need for more precision in patching efforts, specifically by moving away from sole reliance on CVSS and towards the use of EPSS and GCVE, highlights a significant shift in vulnerability management. This means for website owners that the traditional method of prioritizing patches based solely on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) may no longer be sufficient. CVSS scores can sometimes lead to "panic patching," where resources are wasted on vulnerabilities that do not pose a significant threat to a particular website or system. By adopting more precise scoring systems like the Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS) and the Grey Correlation Vulnerability Evaluation (GCVE), website owners can focus their patching efforts more effectively. To adapt to this change, website owners should first review their current patch management processes to identify areas where EPSS and GCVE can be integrated. Second, they should invest in tools that can help automate the patching process based on these more precise scoring systems. Lastly, they should regularly update their llms.txt files to reflect any changes in their patching priorities, ensuring that AI bot traffic related to vulnerability scanning and exploitation attempts is accurately tracked and managed.
Track AI Bots on Your Website
See which AI crawlers like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini are visiting your site. Get real-time analytics and actionable insights.
Start Tracking Free â


