[Orin S. Kerr] What To Do With AI-Generated Legal Scholarship?: Part 2

Orin S. Kerr's exploration of authorship in AI-generated legal scholarship, as discussed in his recent article on Reason.com, raises important questions about the role of human prompters in the creation of AI-generated content. This development has significant implications for website owners, particularly those in the legal and academic spheres, as they must now consider the potential consequences of hosting or citing AI-generated legal scholarship on their platforms. Website owners may need to reassess their content policies and guidelines to account for the increasingly blurred lines between human and AI-generated content. To navigate these changes, website owners can take several steps: first, review and update their llms.txt files to reflect any new policies or guidelines related to AI-generated content; second, consider implementing clear labeling or disclosure requirements for AI-generated content on their platforms; and third, establish protocols for verifying the accuracy and validity of AI-generated legal scholarship to maintain the integrity of their websites and protect their users.